Baleshwar Sahni @ Hira Sahni v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6545 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -183 Year- 2014 Thana -ROSERA District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Baleshwar Sahni @ Hira Sahni Son of Late Awadhi Sahni Resident of Mohalla - Laxmipur, Under Town Rosera, P.S. - Rosera, District - Samastipur (Bihar).
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mira Kumari For the Opposite Party : Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2015 Petitioner is languishing in custody since 29.07.2014 in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 307, 384, 386, 387 of the I.P.C and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
Accusation is that the F.I.R named accused persons and five unknown demanded ransom of rupees two lacs from the informant when on the order of Umesh Mahto, Umesh Mahto, Shashi Mahto and Sonu Mahto fired upon the informant causing injuries to him. The name of the petitioner sprang up on confession of Shashi Mahto to the effect that Shashi Mahto collected his fire arm and cartridge from the petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that even assuming the confession of the co-accused, no offence is made out against the petitioner. It is further
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6545 of 2015 (2) dt.19-02-2015 2/2 submitted that co-accused Fulena Mahto has been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 6105 of 2015.
Considering the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rosera, Samastipur in connection with Rosera P.S. Case No. 183 of 2014.
Since the petitioner has criminal antecedent, let learned Court below cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner, if the petitioner defaults for two consecutive occasions during trial.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) Shageer/- U T