← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6357/2019dismissed

Anand Kumar Shaw And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2025-03-21Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6357 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1894 Year-2009 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== 1.

Anand Kumar Shaw And Ors Son Of Late Harilal Shaw Resident Of Mohalla- Nova Nagar, Phase- I , B-1, 2nd Floor, South Of Khoza Imli, Phulwari Sharif, P.S.- Phulwari, District- Patna. 2.

Amit Kumar Shaw @ Amit Kumar Son Of Anand Kumar Shaw Resident Of Mohalla- Nova Nagar, Phase- I , B-1, 2nd Floor, South Of Khoza Imli, Phulwari Sharif, P.S.- Phulwari, District- Patna. 3.

Sumit Kumar Shaw @ Sumit Kumar Son Of Anand Kumar Shaw Resident Of Mohalla- Nova Nagar, Phase- I , B-1, 2nd Floor, South Of Khoza Imli, Phulwari Sharif, P.S.- Phulwari, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

State Of Bihar 2.

Manoranjan Son of Ratneshwar Prasad Resident of Dulari Niketan, Mohanpur, New Punaichak, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 21-03-2025 This is an application for quashing of the order dated 20.05.2017 passed in Complaint Case No. 1894© of 2009 passed by the learned A.C.J.M., VIth, Patna by which the prayer for discharge of the petitioners was rejected.

2. By the impugned order, the discharge application filed by the petitioners was rejected by the learned Magistrate. The learned Magistrate has found enough materials from the evidence of the witnesses examined in the complaint for proceeding for framing of charge.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6357 of 2019(4) dt.21-03-2025 2/2

3. Strong prima-facie case has been found against the petitioners for framing of charge by the Court below and I do not find any ground to interfere in the impugned order.

4. Accordingly, this application is dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) Shishir/- U T