Pappu Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.365 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-451 Year-2019 Thana- HISUWA District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

PAPPU CHAUDHARY Son of Ganauri Chaudhary Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada 2.

Sudhir Kumar Son of Kailash Prasad @ Kailash Singh Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada 3.

Binod Singh @ Binod Kumar @ Binod Kumar Singh Son of Late Saho Singh Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada 4.

Bahuri Yadav Son of Raghu Prasad Yadav Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada 5.

Jagdish Yadav Son of Shyam Yadav Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada 6.

Ishwari Kahar Son of Late Kailash Kahar Resident of Village - Manjhaway, P.S.- Hisua, District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arjun Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs.Gulnar Begum ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 24-01-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since the petitioner no.2 namely Sudhir Kumar has been apprehended and taken into custody, therefore, his bail application has been rendered infructuous.

Accordingly, the bail petition filed on behalf of the petitioner no.2 is dismissed as infructuous.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.365 of 2020(2) dt.24-01-2020 2/2 So far the petitioner no.1, 3, 4, 5 and 6 are concerned, they are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hisua (Hasua) P.S. Case No.451 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 332, 333, 353, 306, 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition Excise Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the alleged recoveries were from a bush and not from the conscious possession of the petitioners.

Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances and that the petitioners are having no criminal antecedent, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II-cum-Special Judge, Nawada, in connection with Hisua (Hasua) P.S. Case No.451 of 2019.

(Anjana Mishra, J.) amit/- U T