Santosh Kumar v. Union Of India
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.593 of 2022 ====================================================== Santosh Kumar, Son of Sri Shyamanand Prasad, Resident of Village - Bhatu Bigha, P.O. and P.S. Ekangarsarai, District- Nalanda at Biharsharif. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
Union of India through the Ministry of Railway, Government of India, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi - 11001.
2.
The Chairman, Central Recruitment Committee / constable, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi- 11001. 3.
The Principal Chief Security Commissioner, E.Co., Railway / Rail Sadan, Bhuwaneshwar- 751017.
4.
The APIO and ACC / RPF, East Coast Railway, Rail Sadan Samanta Vihar, Bhuwaneshwar- 751017.
5.
The Director / Secretary, Railway Protection Force and Railway Protection Special Force, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, New Delhi110001. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Ms. Kanak Verma, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 23-03-2026 The petitioner has filed the instant application for the following reliefs :- "(I) For issuance of an appropriate writ in the nature of MANDAMUS, commanding and directing the Respondent Authorities to select /appoint the petitioner to the post of Constable Group "C" in Railway Protection Force pursuant to the Employment Notice No.
CONSTABLE/RPF-01/2018 on the ground that the petitioner had got 116.97 marks in the said recruitment process and several candidates below the petitioner has been selected by the
Patna High Court CWJC No.593 of 2022(5) dt.23-03-2026 2/2 Respondents ignoring the petitioner.
(II) For issuance of any other appropriate writ/writs, order /orders, direction/ directions for which the writ petitioner would be found entitled under the facts and circumstances of the case."
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.
3. In view of the above, the application is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Partha Sarthy, J) avinash/- U