← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2171/2022disposed

Manki Devi @ Most. Manki Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-30Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2171 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-318 Year-2020 Thana- BASOPATTI District- Madhubani ====================================================== MANKI DEVI @ MOST. MANKI DEVI Wife of Late Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village - Viratpur, P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Laxmi Yadav @ Neta Jee Son of Late Dukhi Yadav Resident of Village - Viratpur, P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani. 3.

Ramchandra Yadav Son of Late Jebi Yadav Resident of Village - Viratpur, P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani.

4.

Sitamber Yadav Son of Ramchandra Yadav Resident of Village - Viratpur, P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani.

5.

Ranjeet Yadav Son of Pitamber Yadav Resident of Village - Viratpur, P.S. - Basopatti, District - Madhubani.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav, Advocate :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 30-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The present application for cancellation of bail has been filed against the order dated 18.11.2021 passed by the learned Court of District and Sessions Judge, Madhubani, whereby and whereunder the bail was granted to the opposite parties no.2 to 5.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ground relates to supervening circumstance of threatening the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2171 of 2022(4) dt.30-01-2026 2/2 petitioner and other family members as specifically has been stated in paragraph nos.11 and 12 of the cancellation petition.

4. For urging such grounds, the desirable course would be to move before the concerned Court which has granted privilege of anticipatory bail to the opposite parties no.2 to 5.

5. In such view of the matter, the petitioner is granted liberty to raise the issues before the Court concerned which has granted anticipatory bail to the opposite parties no.2 to 5.

6. With the aforesaid liberty, this application is disposed of.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) anand/- U T