Ramchandra Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8197 of 2017 ====================================================== 1.

Ramchandra Mahto Son of late Nankhu Mahto 2.

Nirmala Devi Wife of Sri Shankar Mahto Both Resident of Village- Madhopur Roshan @ Bisha, P.S. - Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary Revenue Department. 2.

The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reform Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Commissioner, Tirhut Pramandal, Muzaffarpur. 5.

The Director of Consolidation, Bihar at Patna. 6.

The Deputy Director of Consolidation, Sitamarhi. 7.

The Consolidation Officer, Dumra, P.S. Dumra, District- Sitamarhi. 8.

The Collector, Sitamarhi.

9.

The Additional Collector,, Sitamarhi.

10.

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sitamarhi, Sadar. 11.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sitamarhi.

12.

The Circle Officer, Dumra, District- Sitamarhi. 13.

Krishna Kumar Gupta Son of late Sukhdeo Narayan Gupta resident of Mohalla- Bhavadepur, Main Road, Sitamarhi Ward No. 14, P.S.- Sitamarhi, District- Sitamarhi.

14.

Udai Rai Son of late Ganga Rai Resident of Village-Madhopur Roshan @ Bhisa , P.S.Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

15.

Pitambari Devi Wife of Sahdeo Rai Resident of Village- Madhopur Roshan @ Bisha, P.S. - Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

16.

Mukesh Kumar Son of Sahdeo Rai Resident of Village- Madhopur Roshan @ Bisha, P.S. - Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

17.

Rakesh Kumar Son of Sahdeo Rai Resident of Village- Madhopur Roshan @ Bisha, P.S. - Dumra, District- Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rikesh Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Raj Kishore Roy, GP 18 ======================================================

Patna High Court CWJC No.8197 of 2017(2) dt.25-11-2024 2/2 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-11-2024 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous and hence, he may be permitted to withdraw this writ petition.

2. Learned counsel for the State has no objection to this prayer of the petitioners.

3. In view of the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn having become infructuous. (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Harish/- U