Vinod Chandra Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8248 of 2017 ====================================================== Vinod Chandra Jha Son of Late Namo Narain Jha, Resident of MohallaHospital Road, Near Jaldhari Chowk, P.S.- Town Thana, Town and DistrictMadhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Collector cum District Magistrate, Madhubani. 3.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Madhubani.

5.

The Circle Officer, Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani. 6.

The Officer-in-Charge, Raj Nagar Police Station, District- Madhubani. 7.

Hari Narain Kamat, son of Dhrub Narain Kamat, 8.

Uday Kamat, son of Lakhan Kamat, 9.

Halkhori Kamat, son of Sube Kamat, 10.

Dinesh Paswan, son of Fakir Paswan, Respondent no.7 to 10 are resident of Mohalla- Laheriaganj, P.S.- Rajnagar, Anchal- Rajnagar, DistrictMadhubani. 11.

Arun Kamat, son of Late Moti Kamat, 12.

Chandra Dev Kamat, son of Rameshwar Kamat, 13.

Rajendra Kamat, son of Late Sunder Kamat, 14.

Bhogi Kamat, son of Sundar Kamat, 15.

Mukesh Kamat, son of Late Sube Kamat, 16.

Raj Kumar Kamat, son of Halkhori Kamat, 17.

Pitambar Kamat, son of Late Juri Lal Kamat, 18.

Ghutan Kamat, son of Biltu Kamat, 19.

Bauan Kamat, son of not known to the petitioner, 20.

Raju Kamat, son of Mane Lal Kamat, respondent no. 11 to 20 are resident of Village- Marar, P.S.- Rohika, District- Madhubani. 21.

Dhrub Narain Karn, son of Late Bishwambhar Lal Karn, resident of New Chakdah, P.S.- Raj Nagar, District- Madhubani. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None.

For the Respondent no.21:

Mr.Pankaj Kr. Das, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH

Patna High Court CWJC No.8248 of 2017(2) dt.17-04-2023 2/2 ORAL ORDER 17-04-2023 The learned counsel for the respondent-State seeks to file a counter affidavit, which is taken on record. Despite repeated calls, nobody has bothered to appear for the petitioner, hence, it appears that the petitioner has got no interest in prosecuting the present writ petition, thus, this Court has no option but to dismiss the present writ petition for want of prosecution.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/Saurav U