Vikash Thakur@Vikash Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1911 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-713 Year-2021 Thana- SUPAUL District- Supaul ====================================================== Vikash Thakur@Vikash Kumar Son Of Shivan Thakur Resident Of VillageGadhiya Balam, Police Station And District- Madhepura. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ramchandra Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 19-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 713 of 2021 registered under Sections 394 of the Indian Penal Code.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2021, is a person with clean antecedent, charge-sheet has been submitted in the case and the informant alleges that on 03.10.2021 at about 08:15 PM four unknown criminals entered his office and assaulted the informant and his colleague Saroj Kumar and looted Rs. 11,93,268/- along with 29 mobiles and fled.

The learned counsel submits that the F.I.R. was against unknown, the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of Rohit Kumar (brother-in-law) who had purchased the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1911 of 2022(2) dt.19-05-2022 2/2 looted mobile, learned counsel submits that Rohit Kumar disclosed that he had purchased the said mobile from Sintu and he had exchanged the said mobile from this petitioner. It is next submitted that even Rohit has not named the petitioner as one of the accused who had committed the occurrence.

The learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since 05.11.2021, is a person with clean antecedent and charges have been framed, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Supaul P.S. Case No. 713 of 2021.

Further, if the learned court below comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned court below shall, forthwith, cancel his bail bond after recording reason.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) ved/- U T