Globus Spirits Ltd. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.33 of 2020 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8238 of 2019 ====================================================== Globus Spirits Ltd. a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 having corporate office at F-0, Ground Floor, The Mira Corporate Suites, Plot No.1 and 2, Ishwar Nagar, Mathura Road, New Delhi-110065 through its General Manager (HR and Administration) Pritam Singh, Male, aged 45 years, son of Shri Kali Prasad Singh, resident of M.B.J. 283, Kailashpur, Husenabad, P.S. Line Bazar, District Jaunpur (UP) ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise and Prohibition, Bihar, Patna.

2.

Jairaj Handsdah, son of not known to the petitioner, Chief General Manager, Bihar State Office, Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Loknayak Jaiprakash Bhawan (5th Floor), Dak Bunglow Chowk, Patna-800001 3.

Shri Vijay Kumar Verma, Chief General Manager (Operations), Marketing Division, Indian Oil Bhawan, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai-400051 4.

The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.

... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kanupriya, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Rewati Kant Raman, AC to SC-11 For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. K.N Singh, Sr. Advocate (IOCL) Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Devansh Shankar Singh, Advocate Mr. Shivaditya Dhari Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD) 19-04-2024 Ms. Kanupriya, learned counsel for the petitioner, Dr. K.N. Singh, learned Senior counsel assisted by Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra, learned advocate for the opposite parties and Mr. Rewati Kant Raman, learned AC to SC-11 for the State are present.

Patna High Court MJC No.33 of 2020(3) dt.19-04-2024 2/2

2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Hence, this application is not being pressed.

3. The application stands dismissed as having become infructuous.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) (Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/avinash U