Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3835/2019bail granted

Vijay Kr. Singh @ Dabloo Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2019-03-13Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3835 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2018 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== Vijay Kr. Singh @ Dabloo Singh aged about 40 years s/o Shaligram Singh R/o Vill- Sherpur, P.S. Gaura, O.P. Distt. Saran,Chapra. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Dr.Mrityunjaya Kr.Gautam ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-03-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner who is in custody seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 Arms Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of one loaded country made pistol.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He has been framed in this case for extraneous

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3835 of 2019(3) dt.13-03-2019 2/2 reasons. Petitioner is in custody 13.11.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending, in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 495 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U