Sanjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6687 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-47 Year-2025 Thana- BANDHUWA KURAWA District- Banka ====================================================== Sanjeet Paswan S/O Dinesh Paswan Resident of Village- Amba Tari, P.SBandhuwa Kurawa, Distt.- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Saurabh Raj, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2026 Heard Mr. Saurabh Raj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 26.08.2025 in connection with Bandhuwa Kurawa P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 25.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and Section 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act.
3. According to prosecution case, this petitioner along with other accused persons threw bombs on the informant's terrace with intention to harm him and his family.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6687 of 2026(4) dt.01-05-2026 2/3 fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. From perusal of the FIR it appears that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons including this petitioner. He further submits that although the daughter of the informant has received injury but her injury is simple in nature. He further submits that the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 26.08.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries one criminal antecedent other than the present one but fairly submits that he is on bail in the pending matter.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Banka in connection with Bandhuwa Kurawa P.S. Case No. 47 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6687 of 2026(4) dt.01-05-2026 3/3 properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T