Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2169/2025dismissed

Vidhi Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-27Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2169 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2022 Thana- KHUSRUPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Vidhi Paswan Son of Late Ramvriksh Paswan Resident of VillageMaghamalpur, P.S.- Khusrupur, District- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pratibha Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 27-06-2025 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2. This is the third attempt of the petitioner. Earlier the bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 25.01.2023 and 15.09.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 42063 of 2022 and Cr. Misc. No.62688 of 2023 respectively.

3. The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Khusrupur P.S. Case No.30 of 2022, a case registered for the offence under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of the Arms Act.

4. The following order was passed on 15.09.2023 in Cr. Misc. No. 62688 of 2023:- Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. This application for grant of regular bail arise out of Khusharupur P.S.

Case No. 30 of 2022 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302, 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2169 of 2025(3) dt.27-06-2025 2/2 of the Arms Act.

3. A decayed body had been recovered from the house of the petitioner.

4. It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that this is the second attempt for grant of regular bail and the same may be considered in view of the fact that some accused persons have been granted anticipatory bail.

5. The submission of the petitioner does not find favour with this Court and therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

6. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

7. The Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial at the earliest so that the petitioner does not get any benefit of delay trial because of the lapses on the part of the prosecution.

5. Out of fifteen witness, six witness have been examined. The trial is proceeding.

6. Considering the fact that the dead body was recovered from the house of the petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Accordingly, this application for regular bail is hereby rejected.

8. The court below is directed to expedite the trial of the petitioner.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) anand/- U T