← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/1790/2020disposed

Satish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-09-21Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1790 of 2020 ====================================================== Satish Kumar son of Sri Ram Lakhan Singh Resident of Village- Majlishpur, Post Office- Allipur Hatta, Police Station- Mahnar, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Inspector General of Police, Mithila Range, Darbhanga. 3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga. 4.

The Senior Superintendent of Police, Darbhanga. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 6.

The In- Charge Auditor, Police Office, Madhubani, District- Madhubani. 7.

The Enquiry Officer-cum- Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sadar Darbhanga, District- Darbhanga.

8.

The Officer-in- Charge, Rahika Police Station, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Navin Pd Singh.

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Md. Irshad, AC to SC-1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-09-2022 The order of the Superintendent of Police, Madhubani dated 14.10.2019 is put to challenge in the instant writ proceedings whereby and whereunder the petitioner (SubInspector of Police) has been dismissed from service. Being met with objection regarding non-exhaustion of the appellate remedy, the petitioner's counsel submits that the petitioner will avail the remedy within two weeks. He, however, expresses his apprehension of being met with the issue of delay. Since objection has been raised by the learned State

Patna High Court CWJC No.1790 of 2020(3) dt.21-09-2022 2/2 counsel for exhausting the appeal remedy, this Court would observe that should the petitioner file his appeal within two weeks, the appellate authority (respondent No. 3) would be obliged to consider the same on merits to pass reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within eight weeks thereafter.

The writ application is disposed of with the above direction.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U