← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/20155/2016dismiss for nonprosecution

Mithilesh Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2025-08-25Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20155 of 2016 ====================================================== Mithilesh Singh @ Mithilesh Kumar Singh son of Late Shiv Prasad Singh, resident of Village- Dhundhua, P.O.- Khadha, P.S. Nabinagar and DistrictAurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.

3.

The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad. 4.

The Branch Manager, Punjab National Bank Branch- Bodem Nabinagar, Aurangabad.

5.

Umeshwar Prasad Singh, son of Late Shin Prasad Singh, resident of VillageDhundhua, P.O.- Khadha, P.S. Nabinagar and District- Aurangabad. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

None For the State :

Mr. Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19 For the P.N.B.

:

Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 25-08-2025 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State is present.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s):

"for direction to the concerned authority to restrain the private Respondent from withdrawing the compensation amount who has received from mutual consent on the assurance of giving part of compensation to the petitioner and wife to the another brother for the joint

Patna High Court CWJC No.20155 of 2016(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 property which award has been prepared in his favour or refer the matter under section 30 of the L.A. Act."

3. A counter affidavit on behalf of the respondent no.4 is on record, according to which the land has been acquired, amount has been paid and in any dispute between the family, State has no role to play.

4. Though there is force in the submission of the State, since there is no appearance, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution.

(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U