Abul Kasim Hazi Hakim @ Md. Abul Kasim @ Mohammad Abul Quasim v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7345 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2023 Thana- PURNIA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPurnia ====================================================== Abul Kasim Hazi Hakim @ Md. Abul Kasim @ Mohammad Abul Quasim Son of Late Jasim Hazi Hakim @ Late Md. Jasim Uddin Resident of villageward no 16, in front of Muslim Madarsa, Ranihat (Basti), P.S- Simri Bakhtiyarpur, Dist- Saharsa ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Amiruddin son of Md. Subhan village- Budhuiya Gola Ward no. 08, psSarsi, Dist- Purnea ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md Tauqueer Azhar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mrs. Asha Devi, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 :
Mr. Alok Ranjan, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Earlier, vide order dated 30.04.2025, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna, but as per the Mediator's Report (flag 'M'), the mediation has failed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120(B), 420, 467, 468, 471 of the Indian Penal Code.
4. As per prosecution case, in the name of providing Government job, this petitioner took Rs. 3,25,000/- from the complainant in his account. Altogether, this petitioner took Rs.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7345 of 2025(8) dt.01-12-2025 2/2 9,23,000/- from the complainant in different bank accounts ensuring him government job.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, the aforesaid transaction took place between the parties for purchase of medicine. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case by the complainant with a view to grab the entire amount.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State as well as learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposed the bail application. It is further submitted that petitioner has got three criminal antecedents.
7. Considering the nature of accusation and criminal antecedents, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is refused.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T