Santosh Kumar Jha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2594 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-592 Year-2016 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ======================================================

1. Santosh Kumar Jha, son of Ramji Jha

2. Vijay Kumar Jha, son of Ramji Jha

3. Amar Kumar Sah @ Amar Sah son of Yogi Sah All R/o Village-Barmpura,P.S. Mahigachhi Distt.-Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar and anr Bihar

2. Abdul Rajjak son of Md. Juman resident of Village-Baghat, P.S. Manigachhi,Dist.-Darbhanga at present R/o Mokrampur P.S. Sakari,Distt.- Madhubanbi ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 22-01-2019 The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 592(CIS/2016,655(CR)/2016) registered under Sections 420,467,468,471 and 120B of the Indian penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is that they asked the complainant to deposit money which will be doubled in three years and due to that complainant and others had deposited money but thereafter same has not been returned. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been alleged against any of the petitioners that they have collected money and deposited the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2594 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2 same and they have nothing to do with the Primiar Dealmark Limited Primiar Multi State Credit Co-operative Society, Netaji Multi Purpose Co-operative Society Ltd. Company and other societies and petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case.

Heard learned APP also who has opposed the prayer of anticipatory bail..

Having heard both sides and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. However, if petitioners surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below as per the material available on record against them, if possible on same day, without being prejudiced by this order. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sujit/- U T