Pradumman Singh @ Praduman Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.448 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-390 Year-2019 Thana- CHAINPUR District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Pradumman Singh @ Praduman Singh Son of Bhikhan Singh, Resident of Village- Karjaw, P.s.- Chainpur, District- Kaimur (Bhabua). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kumar Sunil For the Opposite Party/s :
Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.390 of 2019 registered for offence punishable under section 30 (a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only one bottle of 180 ml of liquor has been recovered from the possession of the father of the petitioner.
It has been alleged that they used to bring liquor from Uttar Pradesh for the purpose of sale.
The petitioner has no criminal history.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed and he, in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.448 of 2020(4) dt.28-02-2020 2/2 event of arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from today, is directed to be enlarged on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District and Sessions Judge-III, Kaimur, Bhabua in connection with Chainpur P.S. Case No.390 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438 Cr. PC and also subject to the condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court. The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence. The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court.
(Shivaji Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T