← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/24/2022disposed

Bhagya Narayan Ray v. The State Of Bihar Through Sri Pankaj Kumar Pal, The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department

2025-05-05Mr. Justice Sourendra Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.24 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15177 of 2021 ====================================================== Bhagya Narayan Ray S/o Kanai Ray R/o Village- Turki, P.S.- Kurhani, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Sri Pankaj Kumar Pal, the Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department Bihar, Patna.

2.

Sri Amrendra Kumar Sinha, The Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, North Bihar, Patna.

3.

Sri Pranav Kumar, The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur 4.

Sri Mukesh Kumar, The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Muzaffarpur.

5.

Sri Ashok Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Muzaffarpur West, Muzaffarpur.

6.

Sri Rajesh Kumar, The Accountant, Rural Works Department, Works Circle, Muzaffarpur West, Muzaffarpur.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Md. Kamil Akhtar, AC to AAG-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY ORAL ORDER 05-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the State submits that pursuant to the orders of this Hon'ble Court, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department has requested for allotment of fund and subsequently on allotment of the funds by the Department, the petitioner has been paid the claimed amount on 15.02.2023 which is reflected from the perusal of Annexure-C attached to

Patna High Court MJC No.24 of 2022(3) dt.05-05-2025 2/2 the show cause.

3. In view of the same, the contempt petition has become infructuous.

4. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be granted liberty for claiming the interest for the said amount.

5. Liberty is granted.

6. With the aforesaid liberty, the contempt application stands dismissed as having become infructuous. (Sourendra Pandey, J) ajay/- U