← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1067/2025bail granted

Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-01-23Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1067 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-111 Year-2024 Thana- SAKATPUR District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sunil Yadav @ Sunil Kumar Yadav S/o- Late Ram Sevak Yadav VillageDevana Ps- Sakatpur Dist- Darbhanga ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Saroj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey(App84) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 23-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sakatpur PS Case No. 111 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3.

The prosecution case, in short, is that total 609 litres of Nepali liquor was recovered from one Scorpio and two motorcycles.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. It is submitted that seized motorcycles and scorpio do not belong to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1067 of 2025(2) dt.23-01-2025 2/2 petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 04.11.2024 and has got one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of B.N.S.S.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7.

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sakatpur PS Case No. 111 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Raj Ranjan/- U T