← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2278/2022bail granted

Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4g v. The State Of Bihar

2022-07-18Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2278 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2021 Thana- SURSAND District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Sundaram Chaudhary @ 4g Son of Rajiv Ranjan @ Rajiv Chaudhary Resident of Village- Maidan, P.S.- Sursand, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umanath Mishra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-07-2022 Let the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks from today. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sursand P. S. Case No. 422/2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B)a and 26 of the Arms Act. As per prosecution case, there is alleged recovery of one loaded country made pistol alongwith one live cartridge from the pocket of the petitioner. The petitioner was apprehended on the spot.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.09.2021

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2278 of 2022(3) dt.18-07-2022 2/3 and bears criminal antecedent of four cases in which two are of similar nature. Charge sheet has been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence.

The learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, period of custody, charge sheet has already been submitted in this case and there is no likelihood of tampering with the prosecution evidence and also taking into consideration the material available on record, let the petitioner above named be released on bail after framing of charge, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Pupri, Sitamarhi in connection with Sursand P. S. Case No. 422/2021, subject to following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors shall be either father or mother or sister or brother or wife or the person who has sworn the affidavit in bail application.

(ii) Petitioner will co-operate in trial and will remain present on all dates and absence for two consecutive dates without appropriate permission, would be a ground for

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2278 of 2022(3) dt.18-07-2022 3/3 cancellation of bail by the learned Trial court itself. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Alok Kumar Pandey, J) amitkumar/- U T