Guddu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.857 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2022 Thana- COMPLAINT CASE District- Jamui ====================================================== Guddu Yadav Son of Sri Rajendra Yadav Resident of Village- Bhunimahdar, P.O.- Gaura, P.S.- Laxmipur, District- Jamui (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Guriya Devi @ Priti Kumari D/O- Kailu Yadav Resident of VillageKageshwar, P.S.- Khaira, District- Jamui ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narsingh Tanti, APP For the O.P. No.2 :

Mr. P.K. Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner, husband of opposite party no. 2, apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 494, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in which cognizance has been taken for the offence under Section 498A of the IPC.

3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled amicably through the process of mediation and both parties have agreed to live together, as husband and wife along with their children. Petitioner also undertakes to keep opposite party no. 2 with full respect and dignity.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.857 of 2025(6) dt.11-11-2025 2/2 not dispute the aforesaid contention and confirms the fact regarding the settlement entered into between the parties.

5. Here, it is relevant to mention that earlier, with consent of the parties, the matter was referred to Mediation & Conciliation Centre of Patna High Court to explore the possibility of settlement between the parties, which has been resolved in terms of Memorandum of Agreement annexed with Mediator's report.

6. In view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioner, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Jamui in connection with Complaint Case No. 273(C) of 2022, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with condition that petitioner shall abide by all the terms & conditions, mentioned in Memorandum of Agreement, failing which, the learned Court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond of petitioner." (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) AjayMishra/- U T