Patna High CourtMJC/4302/2016dismissed

The Tirhut College Of Physical Education Through Its Secretary Shashi Ranjan Prasad Sinha And ORS v. The State Of Bihar Through The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur And ORS

2017-03-15Mr. Justice Kishore K. Mandal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4302 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 19899 of 2014 ======================================================

1. The Tirhut College of Physical Education through its Secretary Shashi Ranjan Prasad Sinha S/o Late Nagendra Prasad Ballam Babu Lane, East of Over Bridge, Maripur, Muzaffarpur.

2. Ram Japan Rai S/o Late Mahadeo Rai Resident of Mohalla - Rambagh, Head Post Office, District - Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

2. Dharmendra Kumar, I.A.S. the Collector, Muzaffarpur.

3. Vivek Kumar, the Senior Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur.

4. The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Home, Government of India, New Delhi.

5. Rajiv Mehrishi, the Secretary, Ministry of Home, Government of India, New Delhi.

6. Archana Ramasundaram, the Director General of S.S.B. Force Head Quarter, East Block - V. R.K. Puram, New Delhi - 110066.

7. Anand Kumar, the Superintendent of Police, Muzaffarpur.

8. Rishikesh Sharma, the Commandant 29, Battalion, S.S.B. Tirhut College of Physical Education, Jhapaha, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Opp.Parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ugranath Mallik For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ashutosh Ranjan Pandey,AAG-15 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 15-03-2017 Heard the counsel for the petitioners, AC to AAG-15 for the State and Mr. Arvind Kumar Tiwary for the Union of India.

A supplementary show cause on behalf of the opposite party no.2 is filed.

Counsel for the State submits that the premises of the

Patna High Court MJC No.4302 of 2016 (4) dt.15-03-2017 2/2 petitioner-institution in occupation of the Sashastra Seema Bal (for short 'the SSB') has been vacated. Learned counsel for the petitioner(s) does not dispute the aforesaid contention. Considering the above, the present contempt application is dismissed.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) Shyam/- U