← Library
Patna High CourtC. REV./3/2022dismissed

The State Bank Of India v. Gangotri Iron And Steel Co. Ltd.

2022-01-20The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CIVIL REVIEW No.3 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18617 of 2021 ====================================================== 1.

The State Bank of India through the Chairman-Cum- Managing Director, State Bank of India, Corporate Centre, State Bank Bhawan, Madame Cama Road, Mumbai - 400021.

2.

The Stressed Assets Management Branch through its Asst. General Manager, having its Office at State Bank of India, 5th Floor, Zonal Office, Judges Court Road, Anta Ghat, Patna - 800001.

3.

The Aurhorised Officer, The Stressed Assets Management Branch, having its Office at State Bank of India, 5th Floor, Zonal Office, Judges Court Road, Anta Ghat, Patna - 800001.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

Gangotri Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. having registered office at 307, Ashiana Tower, Exhibition Road, Patna through one of its Director, Sanjiv Kumar Choudhary.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sameer Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) (The proceedings of the Court are being conducted by Hon'ble the Chief Justice/Hon'ble Judges through Video Conferencing from their residential offices/residences. Also the Advocates and the Staffs joined the proceedings through Video Conferencing from their residences/offices.) 20-01-2022 Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): "For review of the judgment dated 16/12/2021 passed in CWJC no. 18617 of 2021 by Hon'ble Division bench constituting the Hon'ble Chief Justice along with the Hon'ble Mr. Sanjay Kumar and to uphold the E-Auction dated 18/10/2021 or let the DRT, Patna adjudicate the

Patna High Court C. REV. No.3 of 2022(2) dt.20-01-2022 2/2 issues in question by giving necessary direction."

The order passed is in the nature of a consent order and, as such, we see no reason sufficient enough to review the same.

Petition is dismissed.

Interlocutory application, if any, shall also stand disposed of.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) K.C.Jha/DKS/- U