Kundan Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16312 of 2016 =========================================================== Kundan Kumar son of Late Umesh Paswan Resident of Vill - Jadopur, P.S. - Belaganj, P.O. - Belaganj, Distt - Gaya.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Secretary, East Central Railway Board, Danapur through the Eastern Middle Railway, Danapur through its Secretary (E).

2. The General Manager (Karmik), Eastern Middle Railway Danapur.

3. The Chief Administration Labour Training Camp, D.T.C./M.K.A. East Central Railway, Danapur.

4. Station Manager, Bela Eastern Middle Railway.

5. Station Master, Bela Station, East Central Railway, Gaya. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Mritunjay Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Shekhar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 18-03-2017 From the narration of facts in the order dated 04.07.2016, it is obvious that the litigation on behalf of the present petitioner was being carried out in a lacklustre manner according to his convenience.

Since the Tribunal works strictly in accordance with the procedure and the rules laid down, the refusal of the Tribunal to restore O.A. or to condone the delay in absence of satisfactory explanation having been offered and the condonation application not having been filed within reasonable time, the Tribunal has committed

Patna High Court CWJC No.16312 of 2016 dt.18-03-2017 2/2 no error of law.

The impugned order dated 04.07.2016 is not required to be interfered with. The writ is dismissed. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) (Nilu Agrawal, J.) Arjun/- U