Suresh @ Suresh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.49606 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2016 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ====================================================== Suresh @ Suresh Yadav Late Nanhku yadav Village- Ranga P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Hemant Kumar CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 09-12-2016 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dayal, APP for the State.

A supplementary affidavit is filed.

The petitioner prays for bail in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016 registered under sections 399 and 402 and diverse penal provisions of the Arms Act.

On a tip-off, the S.I. of Police along with other police personnel(s) reached the place of occurrence and arrested seven accused persons including the petitioner. It is alleged that from the possession of the petitioner a country-made loaded pistol was recovered.

The contention of the petitioner is that from the possession of other co-accused(s) apprehended at the place of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.49606 of 2016 (2) dt.09-12-2016 2/2 occurrence country-made pistols were recovered but they have now been released on bail by this Court. In this regard, counsel for the petitioner refers to diverse bail orders passed by this Court enclosed as Annexure-2 series. It is stated that the petitioner has no criminal background and is in custody since 04.07.2016. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 122 of 2016 on condition that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be his own/close family member. In the event of framing of charge, the petitioner shall appear in person each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall have liberty to cancel his bail bonds and secure his arrest in accordance with law.

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J) HR/- U T