Ritik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.6893 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2022 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Ritik Yadav Son Of Sri Pramod Yadav @ Pramod Kumar R/O Vill.- Naya Tola, P.S.- Danapur, Distt.- Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh.1 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 19-06-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 379, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 66 (D) of the I.T. Act. As per FIR, the petitioner used old Instagram I.D./Account of the informant by hacking it and sent request to her relatives and shared her edited photos and MMS with them. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the informant is a girl of questionable character and so many persons are related with her as she is a student of Cimage College S.K. Puri, Patna. He submits that the informant has also brought a case bearing Danapur P.S. Case No. 580 of 2022 against the petitioner and same has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.6893 of 2023(3) dt.19-06-2023 2/2 compromised. He submits that the petitioner has also filed an informatory petition no. 510 of 2022 dated 13.04.2022 against the present informant and her father before the learned A.C.J.M.-I Danapur, Patna. He further submits that petitioner has three criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the petitioner is also involved in the present case.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 680 of 2022. However, if the petitioner surrenders before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today and prays for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on the same day without being prejudiced by this order.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T