Rajaram Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.960 of 2026 ====================================================== Rajaram Kumar Son of Jagdis Mahto, Resident of Village-Siyani, P.S. Karande, District-Sheikhpura.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principle Secretary Revenue Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3.
The Commissioner, Munger.
4.
The District Magistrate cum The Collector, Sheikhpura, District-Sheikhpura. 5.
The District Settlement, Sheikhpura.
6.
The D.C.L.R., Sheikhpura.
7.
The Additional District Magitrate cum Additional Collector, Sheikhpura. 8.
The Sub Divisional Officer, Chewara P.S. Chewara, District-Sheikhpura. 9.
The Block Development Officer, Chewara, P.S. Chewara, DistrictSheikhpura. 10.
The Circle Officer, Chewara, P.S. Chewara, District-Sheikhpura. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Standing Counsel (4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 15-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sheo Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s):
"I. For a directing and commanding to the respondents for entry the correct details of plots and thereafter prepared the Land Parcel Map of ancestral land of the petitioner which by the survey officer has been wrongly prepared LMP and misleading manner.
II. For correction of the land records and
Patna High Court CWJC No.960 of 2026(3) dt.15-04-2026 2/2 LMP (Land Parcel Map) as per lawful partition and possession and protection of the petitioner's property rights.
III. For any other substantial relief/reliefs for which petitioner is entitled for by this Hon'ble Court in the fact and circumstances."
3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the appropriate Revenue Authority/competent Court for the redressal of the grievance.
4. Granting said liberty, the writ petition stands disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Adnan/- U