Dinesh Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2599 of 2024 ====================================================== Dinesh Kumar Singh S/o Chandrika Prasad Singh, Resident of MohallaManbodhnagar, P.S- Bikramganj, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Principal Secretary, Department of Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Principal Secretary, Vigilance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Special Secretary, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Fisheries Officer, Rohtas.

6.

Sanju Devi, W/o Arvind Kumar Singh, Resident of Village- Bhadar, P.S.- Sikraul, District- Buxar.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Additional Advocate General (13) Mr. Arvind Kumar (Spl. P.P. Vigilance) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date : 16-02-2024 The petitioner is aggrieved with the collusive action of the 5th Respondent giving undue benefits to the 6th Respondent. The petitioner admits that on the representation of the petitioner a committee was constituted as per Annexure-2. It is also alleged in the writ petition that the committee is favouring the 6th respondent and has not acted upon its terms of constitution despite a hearing granted to the petitioner. However,

Patna High Court CWJC No.2599 of 2024 dt.16-02-2024 2/2 none of the committee members are impleaded despite allegations having been made against them.

2. We find no reason to entertain the writ petition, which is bad for non-joinder of necessary parties. We are of the opinion that the above writ petition has to be dismissed, but however, leaving liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh one, if so desired.

3. The writ petition would stand dismissed with the liberty aforesaid.

(K. Vinod Chandran, CJ) (Harish Kumar, J) P.K.P./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 16.02.2024 Transmission Date