Guddu Kumar @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1117 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-145 Year-2025 Thana- LALGANJ District- Vaishali ====================================================== Guddu Kumar @ Guddu S/OVinod Rai R/O Vill- Etvarpur Sishaula,P.SLalganj and Dist.- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Dilip Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Satyendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2026 Heard Mr. Dilip Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Satyendra Prasad, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 145/2025 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 126, 115(2), 118, 109, 303(2), 352, 76 ,351(3) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, the accused persons named therein including the petitioner with an intention to kill had assaulted the informant and his son, causing injuries on their body.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner and informant are own Gotia and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1117 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026 2/3 due to land dispute, an altercation took place between them and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioner may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his son but the injuries sustained by them are simple in nature, as opined by the doctor. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.

6. Having heard the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well, having perused the allegation made in the FIR and also the fact that the injuries sustained by the informant and his son are simple in nature and the petitioner has clean antecedent, I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.

7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Vaishali at Hajipur / Concerned Court in connection with Lalganj P.S. Case No. 145/2025,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1117 of 2026(3) dt.03-04-2026 3/3 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.

8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases, as what has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the bail application, this order will automatically lose its force.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T