Roshan Goswami v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1683 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-178 Year-2025 Thana- SARSI District- Purnia ====================================================== Roshan Goswami S/o Late Laddu Goswami R/o Village - Parmanandpur, P.S - Bihariganj, District - Madhepura At present R/o Village - Majhua Premraj, Ward No. 18, P.S - Sarsi, District - Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 09-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-B) a, 26 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, while on night patrolling duty, the police officials began checking vehicles. In the course of such checking, one person riding a motorcycle, who was waiting in the queue, attempted to flee but was apprehended. Upon search of his person, three cartridges, one motorcycle, and an iron rod with a modified structure were recovered from his possession.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1683 of 2026(3) dt.09-04-2026 2/2
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. It has also been submitted that the procedure prescribed under Section 103 of the B.N.S.S. has not been followed. Moreover, the petitioner has been made victim of police atrocities. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner has clean criminal antecedent and is in custody since 11.09.2025
5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioner above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Purnia, in connection with Sarsi P.S. Case No. 178 of 2025.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Praveen Kumar, J) Jyoti/- U T