Md. Sahid @ Md. Shaid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.511 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-116 Year-2019 Thana- NARPATGANJ District- Araria ====================================================== 1.

Md. Sahid @ Md. Shaid Son of Md. Nairuddin Resident of Village- Khaira Chanda, P.S.- Narpatganj, Distt- Araria.

2.

Md. Amrul Son of Md. Nairuddin Resident of Village- Khaira Chanda, P.S.- Narpatganj, Distt- Araria.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr.Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, Addl Public Prosecutor ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned counsel for the State.

Petitioners apprehend arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323/34 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Defence of the petitioners is that the police after investigation submitted final form. Petitioners committed no offence and have falsely been implicated. The instant case has been filed by the informant to save his skin from a case which has been filed by petitioner no.1 against the informant and his relative. Petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. Considering the facts of the case, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the Court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st class, Araria in Narpatganj Police Station Case No. 116/2019,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.511 of 2020(2) dt.19-02-2020 2/2 on the following conditions:-

(1) Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Shashi U T