← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/19968/2016disposed

Kanhaiya Prasad And ORS v. The Union Of India And ORS

2025-12-01Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19968 of 2016 ====================================================== 1.

Kanhaiya Prasad S/o Late Dhanpat Yadav 2.

Brij Bihari Singh, S/o Late Dharichhan Singh @ Jagarnath Singh. 3.

Ranglal Singh S/o Late Ganpat Yadav, All are resident of Kalyanpur, P.S. Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India 2.

The Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Govt. of India, New Delhi. 3.

The General Manager, Eastern Central Railway Zone, Hajipur, Vaishali, Bihar.

4.

The Divisional Railway Manager, Danapur Mandal, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

5.

The Senior Divisional Engineer, Co-ordinance, Danapur Mandal, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Pat 6.

The Divisional Engineer Line, Danapur Mandal, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

7.

The Assistant Engineer Line, Danapur Mandal, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Patna.

8.

The Inspector of Work, Engineering Branch, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur Mandal, Branch Ara, Dis ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Aditya Narayan Singh-1, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Heard Aditya Narayan Singh-I, learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:

(i) for issuance of to the appropriate writ, rule or direction respondents authorities to

Patna High Court CWJC No.19968 of 2016(2) dt.01-12-2025 2/3 make payment of the compensation amount on the present market value along with statutory interest as well as compensation for damage of crops due to cutting the soil from the lands of the petitioner which has been taken possession by the respondent authorities without providing the compensation amount as the land of the petitioners have been taken in possession by the respondent authorities without informing the petitioner or completing the acquisition procedure since no amount has been paid for their land and the possession has been taken by the respondent authorities by cutting the soil from their lands destroying the crops standing thereon without providing compensation to the said lands;

(ii) for grant of relief or reliefs as petitioners are found entitled

3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners submit that he shall be filing an appropriate petition before appropriate authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.19968 of 2016(2) dt.01-12-2025 3/3

4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of. (Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U