Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12152 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-518 Year-2020 Thana- BETTIAH CITY District- West Champaran ====================================================== ANIL KUMAR @ ANIL KUMAR CHAUDHARY S/o RAMBRIKSH CHAUDHARY R/O VILLAGE KERWA, POLICE STATION-KURHANI TURKI O.P, DISTRICT MUZAFFARPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sachida Nand Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shakir Ahamd For the Informant : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties through virtual Court proceedings.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Bettiah Town P.S. Case No. 518 of 2020 registered for the offences punishable under Section 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, West Champaran at Bettiah. The petitioner in association of other co-accused is said to have embezzled the deposited amount of the informant

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12152 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/3 in Swarn India Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Limited.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place. He has been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner has four criminal antecedents of similar nature of the offence as mentioned in para-3 of this application. Learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioner is the C.M.D. of Swarn India Multi State Credit Co-operative Society Limited in which the informant had deposited his money and has four criminal antecedents of similar nature of the offence, hence he does not deserve anticipatory bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of case and particularly considering the criminal antecedents, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is hereby rejected. However, the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court below within six weeks from today and seek regular bail and the learned Court below would pass order in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12152 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 3/3 accordance with law without being prejudiced by this order. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T