Shambhu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.920 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.

Shambhu Yadav Son of Lakhan Yadav, Resident of Village - Jamalchak, P.S. - Atri, District - Gaya.

2.

Kaushal Kumar, Son of Basudeo Prasad, Resident of village- Gauripur, P.S. - Singheshwar, District - Madhepura.

3.

Barsha Kumari, W/o Saket Bihari Ranjan, Resident of village - Bagdov, P.S. - Naya Ganw, District - Begusarai.

4.

Juli Kumari, Daughter of Binod Singh, Resident of village - Samardah, P.S. - Bihiya, District - Bhojpur.

5.

Soni Kumari, Wife of Kundan Kumar, Resident of village - Ashadhi, P.S. - Muffasil, District- Nawada.

6.

Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Son of Shankar Singh, Resident of village - Atarsan, P.S. - Rasulpur, District - Saran.

7.

Shankar Kumar, Son of Bhikhar Yadav, Resident of Village - Dharhara, P.S. - Rafiganj, District - Aurangabad.

8.

Arvind Kumar, Son of Ram Ekbal Singh, Resident of Village - Bajitpur, P.S. - Sanjhauli, District - Rohtas.

9.

Sanjeev Kumar, Son of Late Premchandra Prasad, Resident of village - Bankipur Gorakh, P.S. - Fatuha, District - Patna. 10.

Laxmi Narayan Singh, Son of Ram Puran Singh, Resident of Village - Karamkila, P.S. - Baghaila, District - Rohtas. 11.

Dilip Kumar, Son of Nageshwar Prasad Yadav, Resident of village - Kaushalpur, P.S. - Murliganj, District - Madhepura. 12.

Rakesh Kumar, Son of Nand Kishore Maharaj, Resident of villageMansagar, Phuldih, P.S. - Rupow, District - Nawada. 13.

Kumari Rinku Singh, Wife of Upendra Singh, Resident of village- Majharia, P.S. and District- Buxar.

14.

Shilpi Kumari, D/o- Yogendar Singh, Resident of village - Karnauti, P.S. - Bakhtiyarpur, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additioanl Chief Secretary, Home Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Home Police Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 4.

The Chairman Central Selection Board, of Constable, Bihar, Patna. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Gopalganj.

... ... Respondent/s ======================================================

Patna High Court CWJC No.920 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2024 2/3 Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chitranjan Sinha, Sr. Adv.

Mr.Ranjeet Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Ayush Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Kanishk Kaustubh, Adv.

Mr. Shikhar Mani, Adv.

Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. AC to SC-11 For the CSBC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Adv.

Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Adv.

Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 15-02-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief:- "1. For issuance of direction to the respondents authorities to grant seniority and all consequential benefits to the petitioners on the basis of their merit position in the redrawn merit list of the constable irrespective of their date of joining on the post of constable arising out of Advertisement No. 2 of 2009 issued by the Central Selection Board of Constable, Bihar, Patna for the post of constable, as several hundred candidates who had lesser marks were declared successful before the petitioners and they were allowed to join and the petitioners names were left out and their results were not published only because of the lapses on the part of the Central Selection Board of Constable and their results were published after several round of litigation before this Hon'ble Court."

Patna High Court CWJC No.920 of 2024(2) dt.15-02-2024 3/3 2.

At the outset, the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioners to approach the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, i.e. the Respondent No. 3, for redressal of their aforesaid grievances. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

It is needless to state that in case the petitioners approach the Respondent No. 3, by filing appropriate representation, within a period of two weeks from today, the same shall be disposed off, by a reasoned and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of six weeks, thereafter. 4.

The writ petition stands disposed off on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U