Suman Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2320 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-422 Year-2018 Thana- TRIVENIGANJ District- Supaul ====================================================== Suman Sah Hiralal Sah Resident of Village-Ladugadh, P.S.- Jankinagar, District- Purniya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Shiva Shankar Sharma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 422 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 379 and 411 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant has alleged that on 29.10.2018 when he was taking meal petitioner stole his bag and tried to flee away but he was caught by the help of villagers and handed over to the police.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case on suspicion. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 30.10.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2320 of 2019(2) dt.22-01-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Supaul, in connection with Triveniganj P.S. Case No. 422 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/manojU T