← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./4488/2024allowed

Laljeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-08Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4488 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-566 Year-2023 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Laljeet Kumar Son Of Nandlal Prasad Resident Of Village - Sonbarsa, Police Station - Warisaliganj, District - Nawada 2.

Nitish Kumar Son Of Devnandan Prasad Resident Of Village - Sonbarsa, Police Station - Warisaliganj, District - Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Birendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amitesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 08-02-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are languishing in custody in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 66(b) and 66(d) of the I.T. Act.

It is alleged that on getting information that some persons are involved in cyber crime and trying to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4488 of 2024(2) dt.08-02-2024 2/3 cheat the innocent people in the name of advancing the loan, raid was laid and seven accused persons including the petitioners were arrested.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are innocent and they have falsely been implicated in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioners claim the seized mobile phones to be their own mobile phones. The petitioners are languishing in custody since 09.11.2023. A statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. In contra, learned A.P.P appearing on behalf of the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts aforesaid and the period under custody, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousands) each with two sureties of the like

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4488 of 2024(2) dt.08-02-2024 3/3 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 566 of 2023.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Shageer/- U T