← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/10482/2018disposed

Sanjay Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-20Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10482 of 2018 ====================================================== Sanjay Pandey, Son of Late Ram Chandra Pandey, Resident of VillageKhatoliya, P.S. - Sheosagar, District- Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Excise, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram

3. The Superintendent of Police, Rohtas at Dehri-on-Sone

4. The District Excise Officer, Rohtas at Sasaram

5. The S.H.O. Sheosagar (Baddi O.P.) Police Station, District- Rohtas ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajani Kant Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kumar Manish -Sc5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 20-06-2018 Having heard learned counsel for the parties, we direct that pending finalization of the criminal case i.e. Sheosagar (Baddi) P.S. Case No.266 of 2017, vehicle of the petitioner (Hero HG Deluxe Motor Cycle) bearing Regn. No.BR24V 8062 be released to the petitioner on the petitioner furnishing two sureties to the satisfaction of District Magistratecum-Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram. In case the respondents want to take action for confiscation, they are cautioned to take note of Section 56 of the Act and shall initiate proceedings only if the confiscation

Patna High Court CWJC No.10482 of 2018(2) dt.20-06-2018 2/2 proceedings can be initiated in a case like this where there is no seizure of liquor and the vehicle is not used for transportation of liquor and only the driver is found to have driven the vehicle in a drunken condition. In case confiscation proceedings are initiated and finally it is found that the confiscation could not be initiated being contrary to Section 56, the petitioner shall have liberty to seek compensation to be paid by the officer concerned personally who takes action in the matter.

The vehicle in question be released within one week from the date of furnishing the sureties.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands allowed and disposed of.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) ( Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) K.C.Jha/- U