Pappu Panjiyara @ Prabhat Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1472 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-125 Year-2017 Thana- AMARPUR District- Banka ====================================================== PAPPU PANJIYARA @ PRABHAT RANJAN Son of Late Jagdish Panjiyara Resident of Village- Nagardih, P.S. Phullidumar (Amarpur), District - Banka. ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Brij Nandad Prasad, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Sadanand Paswan, Spl. PP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 30-07-2021 Heard the parties in virtual Court.

This is an appeal under Section 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 against the refusal of prayer for bail vide order dated 07.07.2020 passed by the learned 1st Addl. Sessions Judge, Banka in Amarpur (Fullidumar) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2017 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

Appellant is in custody since 29.07.2019. Co-accused Sanjeev Panjiyara has already been allowed bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No. 3056 of 2018.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1472 of 2021(3) dt.30-07-2021 2/2 Submission is that during investigation it surfaced that co-accused Santosh Panjiyara was the assailant of the deceased. Considering the facts aforesaid, let the appellant, above named, be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 20,000/- (Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, with following conditions:

(a) Both the bailors shall be the resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned Court-below.

(b) The appellant shall fully cooperate with the trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant.

(c) The appellant shall not leave the country without permission of the trial Court.

Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and the appeal is allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) mantreshwar/- U R