Dharmendra Prasad @ Dhramvir Prasad @ Tanikan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2283 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-588 Year-2025 Thana- NOORSARAI District- Nalanda ====================================================== Dharmendra Prasad @ Dhramvir Prasad @ Tanikan S/O Late Sukhlal Yadav @ Sukhlal R/O Village- Kathanpura, P.S- Noorsarai, Distt.- Nalanda. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Renu Kumari, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 588 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 126(2)115(2), 351(2), 352, 109, 74 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that on 08.11.2025, while informant was going to his field, in the meantime, petitioner along with Yogendra Prasad stopped him and started abusing him. On protest, they assaulted him by means of iron rod with intent to kill him.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner is Gotiya of the informant. There is land disputed in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2283 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 2/3 between the parties. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that general and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioner. There is case and counter case between the parties. The nature of injury is said to be simple in nature. Hence, no offence under Section 109 of BNS is made out. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the nature of injury as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- ( Rupees Fifteen Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Noorsarai P.S. Case No. 588 of 2025, subject to the following conditions: (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2283 of 2026(2) dt.21-01-2026 3/3 consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) manish/- U T