Sandeep Kumar Raut @ Sandeep Kumar Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.2627 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-127 Year-2021 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sandeep Kumar Raut @ Sandeep Kumar Das, Son Of Chulhai Das Resident Of Village - Bhagya Nagar, P.S. - Kalyanpur, District - East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/S
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-05-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 28.06.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and has antecedent of one case, which was instituted after the present F.I.R.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the informant alleges that he was intercepted by two unknown criminals, who looted his mobile, motorcycle on gun point and fled towards Rajepur Kesariya road.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Prior to institution of the present F.I.R., the petitioner was a person
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.2627 of 2022(2) dt.25-05-2022 2/2 with clean antecedent.
It is next submitted that from perusal of the seizure list, it would manifest that the looted motorcycle was recovered from the road, but the impugned order records that in the case diary at Para-37 that the motorcycle was recovered from the garage of the petitioner. It is next submitted that the petitioner, despite being in custody, was not put on T. I. Parade, nor the looted motorcycle was recovered from his garage. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.
Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and taking into consideration the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court below where the case is pending in connection with Kalyanpur P. S. Case No.127 of 2021.
The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T