Anand Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.4483 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-455 Year-2025 Thana- KUCHAIKOTE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Anand Baitha, S/o Bhulan Baitha, R/o Village - Shyampur, P.S - Kuchaikote, District - Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shubhesh Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 455 of 2025 dated 07.10.2025, instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 352, 351(2), 3(5) of Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that on the alleged date of occurrence, the petitioner and other accused persons abused the informant and his family members. It is further alleged that the petitioner assaulted on the head of the informant by means of Daab.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.4483 of 2026(2) dt.28-01-2026 2/2 is case and counter case between the parties. Both the sides are close agnates. Due to land dispute, the said F.I.R. has been lodged. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that specific allegation against the petitioner is that he assaulted with sharp cut weapon on the head of the informant, due to which he sustained head injury. On the contrary, the injury report does not support the case of the prosecution. The Doctor opined that all the injury are simple in nature and caused by hard and blunt substances. Lastly, it has been submitted that the petitioner is in custody since 28.11.2025 having one criminal case against him. Charge-sheet has been submitted in the case.

5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Gopalganj in Kuchaikote P.S. Case No. 455 of 2025.

(Khatim Reza, J) premchand/- U T