Kamlesh Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1146 of 2016 (3) dt.19-02-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.1146 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2015 Thana -MUFFASIL District- AURANGABAD ======================================================
1. Kamlesh Ram, Son of Late Ram Chandra Ram,
2. Brajesh Ram, Son of Kamlesh Ram, Both resident of Village - Raipura, Tole Dharambigha, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Kamlendra Pd. Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dashrath Mehta (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners are accused in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 126 of 2015 registered under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Prevention of Witch (Daain) Practices Act. The allegation of informant is that on 22.06.2015, in the evening, while he was present in his house, his younger brother, petitioner no.1, along with his two sons, Brajesh Ram (petitioner no.2) and Amresh Ram came there and started to abuse him. When the informant made protest then petitioner no. 1 gave sword blow at his head whereas petitioner no. 2 gave lathi blow at
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1146 of 2016 (3) dt.19-02-2016 his back and Amresh Ram also caused injury through lathi on his leg and hand.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 and the informant are own brother and due to land dispute, hot talk were exchanged and both parties sustained injury. It is further submitted that only two injuries were found on the person of the informant and only one injury is said to be grievous in nature. It is further submitted that petitioners have no criminal antecedent.
Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named, re directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 126 of 2015. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T