Anwar Mian @ Anwar Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1020 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-387 Year-2019 Thana- TURKAULIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1.

ANWAR MIAN @ ANWAR ALAM Son of Late Sattar Mian Resident of Village - Senwariya, P.S. - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran. 2.

Tabrej Alam Son of Late Sattar Mian Resident of Village - Senwariya, P.S. - Turkauliya, District - East Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-05-2020 Heard Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel appearing for the State, through video conferencing.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Turkauliya P.S. Case No. 387 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 325, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioners as per the First Information Report is that while her husband was sitting near his door, the petitioners along with other accused persons arrived at the house of the informant and both the petitioners, assaulted the informant's husband, by means of lathi and rod

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1020 of 2020(3) dt.28-05-2020 2/2 causing his death.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners and the allegation is omnibus and general in nature.

After having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the fact that petitioners are named in the First Information Report and as per the FIR as a main assailant and the death of the deceased as per the post-mortem report is due to haemorrhage and head injury caused by hard blunt object, I am not inclined to grant regular bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, the prayer for the same is hereby rejected.

However, if the trial does not progress within one year, the petitioners may renew their prayer for bail after completion of one year from today in accordance with law. (Anil Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U T