← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/18812/2008dismissed

Shrimant Kumar Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-04-04Mr. Justice Rakesh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 18812 of 2008 ======================================================

1. Shrimant Kumar Yadav, Aged about 38 years, Son of Late Bahadur Lal Yadav, Resident of: Village - Chilahapara, P.S.- Balrampur, District - Katihar.

2. Sahdeo Prasad Das, Aged about 43 years, Son of Late Gopal Chandra Das, Resident of: Village - Sahasara, P.S.- Balrampur, District - Katihar.

3. Ramesh Deo Sharma, Aged about 39 years, Son of Late Mal Singh Deo Sharma, Resident of: Village - Mohdipur, P.S.- Balrampur, District - Katihar.

4. Gaydeb Kumar Roy, Aged about 46 years, Son of Late Nageshwar Prasad Roy, Resident of: Village - Bagdar, P.S.- Azamnagar, District - Katihar.

5. Hira Lal Das, Aged about 47 years, Son of Late Sepal Chandra Das, Resident of: Village - Karnpur, P.S.- Barsoai, District - Katihar.

6. Jayanta Kumar Das, Aged about 46 years, Son of Late Dhaneshwar Prasad Das, Resident of: Village - Mukuria, P.S.- Azamnagar, District - Katihar.

.... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Principal Secrretary, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Director, Panchayati Raj Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. The Commissioner, Purnia Division, Purnia.

6. The District Magistrate, Katihar.

7. The District Panchayat Raj Officer, Katihar. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s : AC to GP - 13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 4.

04-04-2017 Sri Rajesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for petitioners, in presence of learned A.C. to Govt. Pleader - 13, submits that by efflux of time the present writ petition has become infructuous.

Patna High Court CWJC No.18812 of 2008 (4) dt.04-04-2017 2/2 Accordingly, it is dismissed as same has become infructuous.

(Rakesh Kumar, J.) Anay U