← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/2193/2018disposed

Arvind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar v. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar And ORS

2025-07-11Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2193 of 2018 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3771 of 2017 ====================================================== Arvind Kumar @ Arbind Kumar S/o Late Yamuna Singh, R/o Vill.- Masradpur, P.O. P.S.- Shahjahanpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

Mr. Deepak Kumar, Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar 2.

Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, the Principal Secretary- cum-Commissioner, Water Resources Department, Govt. of Bihar.

3.

Mr. Dr. Rrajev Kumar Kumar, the Special Secretary, Water Resources, Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Yogeshwar Dhari Singh, the Managing Director, Bihar State Construction Corporation Ltd., H/Q at Khojai Imali, Anisabad, Patna. 5.

Mr. Ram Pukar Ranjan, the Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department , Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

Mr. Kumar Ravi, District Magistrate, Patna.

7.

Mr. Sanjay Ojha, the Executive Engineer- Cum-Works Manager, Bihar State Construction Corporation, Ltd., Garhi Jalasai Yojna, Jamui Unit Camp, Garhi, District-Munger.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Vinay Kirti Singh, GA- 2 Mr. Sumant Kumar Singh, AC to GA-2 For the Opposite Party No. 4 :

Dr. Anand Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 11-07-2025 The learned counsel for the respondent no. 4 Dr. Anand Kumar submits that in compliance of the order of this Court dated 29.03.2018 passed in CWJC No. 3771 of 2017, the Managing Director, Bihar State Construction Corporation Limited has already passed a reasoned order dated 27.04.2018, rejecting the claim of the petitioner, hence the order of this

Patna High Court MJC No.2193 of 2018(5) dt.11-07-2025 2/2 Court has stood complied with.

2.

At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid order dated 27.04.2018, if so advised, by availing such remedies as are otherwise available under the law. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U