Vivekanand Yadav @ Disko Yadav @ Disko v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1882 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-418 Year-2025 Thana- PIRPAINTI District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Vivekanand Yadav @ Disko Yadav @ Disko S/O Brahmdeo Yadav @ Photo Yadav R/o Village- Dulduliya, P.S.-Pirpainti, District- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 02-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 418 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109, 351(2) and 3(5) of B.N.S. and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. The case of the prosecution, in short, is that on 20.09.2025, information was received by the police that in village- Dulduliya, the petitioner along with other criminal was roaming around the village and firing. In this regard, FIR was registered. Villagers reported that the petitioner along with others have targeted people and fired at them with the intent to fear and terror in the upcoming festivals in Bihar Assembly Election 2025. It was also reported by the villagers that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1882 of 2026(3) dt.02-02-2026 2/3 petitioner is a notorious criminal.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that all the information are received by villagers and no name of villagers are there in the FIR. He has further submitted that there is only allegation against this petitioner is that he was making firing but nobody has received any injury and the allegations are bald. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that co-accused Lav Kush Yadav having similar nature of allegation has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 19.01.2026 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 91188 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 13.11.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail and has submitted that petitioner is having one criminal antecedent.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1882 of 2026(3) dt.02-02-2026 3/3 of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M. Bhagalpur in connection with Pirpainti P.S. Case No. 418 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Shubham/- U T