← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/17695/2008dismissed

Indu Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-11-17Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17695 of 2008 ====================================================== Indu Kumari, daughter of Shri Awadh Narayan Yadav, resident of Village Nawaw Ganj, P.O. Alinagar, P.S. Suryagarha, District Lakhisarai .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government of Bihar,

3. District Magistrate, Lakhisarai, Bihar

4. Deputy Development Commissioner, Lakhisarai, Bihar

5. Sub Divisional officer, Lakhisarai, Bihar

6. Block Development Officer, Chanan, P.S. Chanan in the town and district of Lakhisarai

7. Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Jankidih, P.S. Chanan, District Lakhisarai

8. Sarpanch, Gram Panchayat Raj, Jankidih, P.S. Chanan, District Lakhisarai

9. Subhadra Rani, wife of Sanjay Kumar Mishra, resident of Village Abhaypur, P.O. & P.S. Piri Bazar, District Lakhisarai .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Gp17) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 17-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In the present case, petitioner is claiming for appointment on the post of Nayay Mitra in Gram Panchayat Raj Jankidih under Chanan Block in the district of Lakhisarai. Petitioner is claiming that he should be appointed as Nayay Mitra which is not a civil post. Respondent no.9 has been appointed as Nayay Mitra the scheme provides forum before the Sub Divisional Officer to raise the issue against any wrong has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.17695 of 2008 (5) dt.17-11-2017 done to her which the petitioner has not availed. As it is not a civil post the writ petition does not lie inasmuch as petitioner has not challenged the selection of respondent no.9.

In such view of the matter, this writ petition does not survive and accordingly the same is dismissed. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U