Om Prakash Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.43 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3427 of 2018 ====================================================== Om Prakash Sahni Son of Late Ram Bahadur Sahni, Resident of VillageBelyakub, P.O.- Kabirchak, Police Station- Bahadurpur, District- Darbhanga. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director, Secondary Education, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Regional Deputy Director of Education, Tirhut Division, Darbhanga. 4.

The District Magistrate, Darbhanga.

5.

The District Education Officer, Darbhanga.

6.

The District Programme Officer, Darbhanga.

7.

The Bihar School Examination Board, through its Chairman, Bihar, Patna. 8.

Sanjay Kumar Sahni Son of Late Lal Bihari Sahni, Resident of VillageBelayakub, P.O.- Kabirchak, Police Station- Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. 9.

Vijay Kumar Sahni Son of Late Lal Bihari Sahni, Resident of VillageBelayakub, P.O.- Kabirchak, Police Station- Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. 10.

Jitendra Kumar Sahni Son of Late Lal Bihari Sahni, Resident of VillageBelayakub, P.O.- Kabirchak, Police Station- Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. 11.

kaushal Kumar Son of Late Lal Bihari Sahni, Resident of VillageBelayakub, P.O.- Kabirchak, Police Station- Bahadurpur, DistrictDarbhanga. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Lakshmindra Kumar Yadav, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Hitesh Suman, AC to SC-13 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 04-07-2025 The present petition has been filed for restoration of a writ petition bearing CWJC No. 3427 of 2018, which has stood dismissed for want of prosecution, by an order dated 25.7.2022.

Patna High Court MJC No.43 of 2023(3) dt.04-07-2025 2/2 2.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the counsel for the petitioner had fallen ill suddenly and therefore, he could not attend the hearing of the case, when the case was called out for hearing on 25.7.2022, thus, a sympathetic view be taken and the aforesaid writ petition petition be restored to its original file.

3.

Having regard to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as also considering the averments made in the present petition, I deem it fit and proper to restore the aforesaid writ petition bearing CWJC No. 3427 of 2018 to its original file.

4.

The present restoration petition stands allowed. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Ajay/- U