Parsan Mistry v. Umesha Nand Tiwary And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Review No.163 of 2016 ====================================================== Parsan Mistry son of late Panna Mistry resident of Mainy Sangat Lane and Pandit Ramdhani Tiwary Lane, P.S. Chowk Patna City, District-Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Umesha Nand Tiwary son of late Pandit Nand Kishore Lal Tiwary, resident of Pandit Ramdhani Tiwary Lane, P.S. Chowk Patna City, District-Patna.

2. Chief Executive Officer, Patna Municipal Corporation having its Head office at Budh Marg Patna, P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna.

3. Patna Regional Development Authority through its vice Chairman, Maurya Lok, Dak Banglow Road, P.S. Kotwali, District-Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Naresh Chandra Verma, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 21-09-2016 Heard Mr. Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. After considering the submission, the delay in filing this review application is condoned.

By the impugned judgment under review, the Second Appeal No. 55 of 2012 filed by the defendant assailing the judgment and decree of affirmance has been dismissed holding that no substantial question of law arising for consideration in this appeal.

After considering the submissions on behalf of the petitioner, this Court finds that no error is apparent on the face of

Patna High Court C. REV. No.163 of 2016 (5) dt.21-09-2016 record and there is no sufficient reason for granting the prayer of review.

The review application is, accordingly, dismissed. Devendra/- (V. Nath, J) U