Md. Manzar Imam Betabi And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12764 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.

Md. Manzar Imam Betabi and Ors S/o Md. Faizuddin, Resident of VillageGethora, P.O.- Chandpur, P.S.- Kadwa, District- Katihar. 2.

Murshid Alam, s/o Md. Suleman, Resident of Village- Sondhaghat, Gosaipur, P.O.- Milik Pahlagardh, P.S.- Azamnagar, District- Katihar. 3.

Ashwani Kumar Roy, S/o Ajju Roy, Resident of Village- Taiyabpur Sonapur, P.O.- Mahinagar, P.S. Balia Belown, District- Katihar. 4.

Niranjan Kumar, S/o Rameshwar Pandit, Resident of Village- Daudnagar, P.O.- Daudnagar, P.S.- Shahpur, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar 2.

The Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Education, Department of Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Director, Mass Education Education Department Government of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The District Magistrate, Katihar.

5.

The District Education Officer, Katihar.

6.

The District Education Officer, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar No-1, Adv.

:

Mr. Jitendra Kumar, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra- Sc16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 29-07-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly submits that the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous on account of judgment dated 05.07.2023 rendered by Hon'ble Division Bench of this Court in Civil Review No.59 of 2018 (The State of Bihar & Ors. Vs. Harendra Mishra & Ors.). and

Patna High Court CWJC No.12764 of 2018(2) dt.29-07-2024 2/2 the same may be disposed off accordingly. The operative portion of the said judgment is extracted as under:- "As has been discussed above, as the writ petitioners had admittedly not approached this Court or the Supreme Court on or before 26.02.2016, no relief could have been granted to them. The writ petition filed by them, i.e., CWJC No. 384 of 2017, deserved to be dismissed. Accordingly, we set aside the order dated 03.03.2017 passed in CWJC No. 384 of 2017."

3. In this view of the matter, the present writ petition is hereby disposed off.

(Dr. Anshuman, J.) Prakashmani/- U